Sources told ESPN’s Adam Schefter that Chicago Bears receiver Luther Burden III is expected to miss all three preseason games with a strained groin injury. Those same sources said the Bears believe Burden should be ready for Chicago’s Sept. 13 season opener at the Carolina Panthers. Fantasy managers should treat that as encouraging news—not a guarantee—and apply a modest injury discount rather than removing Burden from draft boards.
CBS Sports’ Matt Zenitz separately reported that Burden is expected to miss about a month, leaving him on a tight but plausible timeline for Week 1. Chicago has not publicly issued a detailed medical timeline, injury grade, or official availability designation.
| Status: Injury: Strained Groin | Preseason: Expected To Miss All 3 Games | Week 1: Expected To Play At Carolina, Sept. 13 |
Latest Update: Wednesday, Aug. 12, 2026, 8:00 a.m. MST
Burden sustained the injury on the final rep of Saturday’s red-zone one-on-one drills after getting tangled with cornerback Tyrique Stevenson. He left the field with trainers and did not return.
The Week 1 expectation did not originate from an official Bears medical announcement. Sources told ESPN’s Adam Schefter that Burden is expected to miss all three preseason games. Those sources said Chicago believes Burden should return for the Sept. 13 season opener.
That projection is encouraging, but it should not be treated as a guarantee. Groin injuries can linger when players accelerate, cut, or decelerate at full speed—all core parts of Burden’s game.
Current answer: Chicago expects Burden to play Week 1. ESPN’s report is the clearest available update, though the team has not provided a detailed recovery timeline or official designation.
A preseason absence carries a different fantasy consequence than a regular-season absence. Missing preseason games primarily costs Burden timing reps with Caleb Williams, offensive-installation work, and opportunities to secure a larger target share. Missing regular-season games would directly cost fantasy managers usable weeks in their lineups and warrant a much steeper draft downgrade.
Burden belongs in the WR25-WR30 range because the current information points to the first outcome, not the second.
| League Format | Recommendation |
| 10-team redraft | Draft Burden only if he falls to approximately WR28-WR30. The waiver wire should offer enough playable receivers to avoid paying for a full breakout before he resumes practice |
| 12-team redraft | Draft Burden around WR25-WR28. His upside remains worth the risk if he falls behind his previous WR21 market cost |
| Dynasty | Hold or buy at a modest discount. A preseason groin injury does not change Burden’s long-term talent profile, age, or projected role in Chicago’s offense |
Burden’s August ADP was WR21, while Rome Odunze sat at WR28. ESPN’s earlier 10-team staff mock data put Burden at WR27 and 56th overall, with Odunze at WR28 and 58th overall.
A fall toward WR25-WR30 properly accounts for the missed preseason without pricing in a regular-season absence that team sources are not currently expecting. Drafting Burden at WR21 means paying for an optimistic outcome before he has cleared the most important recovery hurdle: returning to full practice.
Burden finished his rookie season with 47 receptions, 652 receiving yards and two touchdowns on 60 targets across 15 games. His per-route production, however, was far more impressive than his raw volume.
Burden’s 2025 usage profile:
• 60 targets and a 12.8 percent target share
• 234 routes, with a 44.6 percent route participation rate
• 39.7 percent snap share
• 13 explosive plays, defined as receiving plays of at least 20 yards
• Four red-zone targets, a 7.1 percent share of Chicago’s red-zone targets
• 15 designed targets, showing the Bears actively searched for ways to get him the football
• 2.79 yards per route run, third among qualified NFL wide receivers in PlayerProfiler’s data profile.
Limited playing time kept Burden’s fantasy finish modest. The efficiency suggests the breakout case was based on an anticipated role expansion, not merely hype.
Chicago’s own team site noted that Burden averaged 4.3 receptions and 60.1 yards over his final eight regular-season games. His season included a 65-yard touchdown against the Dallas Cowboys and an eight-catch, 138-yard performance against the San Francisco 49ers. Missing preseason work delays the opportunity to demonstrate that his late-season growth can translate into a larger 2026 workload.
DJ Moore’s exit is meaningful because Chicago has 83 targets, 50 catches, 682 yards and six receiving touchdowns to redistribute from his 2025 production alone. The larger opportunity pool is even bigger. Moore and former Bears receiver Olamide Zaccheaus combined for 166 targets in 2025, and both players are gone.
Burden does not automatically inherit those targets. Odunze and Loveland have stronger established target cases, while veterans and young depth receivers will receive additional preseason reps during Burden’s absence. The path remains obvious, though. Burden would need only a portion of that vacated volume and a significant route-share jump from 44.6 percent to become a weekly fantasy starter.
Chicago’s receiver hierarchy should be viewed as a three-player competition rather than a simple Burden breakout story.
| Player | 2025 Production | Current Fantasy Cost | Best Fantasy Case |
| Luther Burden | 47 catches, 652 yards, 2 TDs on 60 targets | WR21 before injury; recommended draft range: WR25-WR30 | Becomes Chicago’s primary slot and yards-after-catch weapon with a major route increase |
| Rome Odunze | 44 catches, 661 yards, 6 TDs on 90 targets | WR28, 58th overall in ESPN’s staff ADP | Leads Bears wide receivers in targets after Moore’s departure |
| Colston Loveland | 58 catches, 713 yards, 6 TDs on 82 targets | TE3, 45th overall in ESPN’s staff ADP | Remains Williams’ most reliable middle-of-field and red-zone option |
Odunze led the Bears in targets despite missing the final five regular-season games with a foot injury. Loveland led Burden in receptions, receiving yards, touchdowns and targets while becoming a central part of the offense.
Burden has the most explosive efficiency profile of the three, but he also has the weakest 2025 volume foundation. That creates more upside than certainty.
Loveland is the safest fantasy investment because tight end scarcity boosts his value and his rookie-year target volume was already strong. Odunze offers the clearest wide receiver target-share case. Burden offers the strongest post-injury discount if his price drops into the proper range.
A positive signal would be Burden returning as a full participant in individual drills, then taking 11-on-11 reps without a reported workload restriction. Participation in red-zone work and first-team periods would provide the strongest evidence that the Bears see him as ready for his normal role.
A neutral signal would be limited participation, work on a side field, or individual drills without team reps. Those developments would suggest recovery progress but would not yet justify moving Burden back to his pre-injury draft cost.
A negative signal would be an extended absence after preseason ends, a return to limited work following full participation, or any report that the Bears are reconsidering his Week 1 availability. Any of those outcomes should push Burden closer to a bench-stash selection than a weekly starter.
The Luther Burden injury makes him riskier, but it does not erase his fantasy football upside. ESPN’s Monday report matters because it pairs an expected preseason absence with a team-source expectation that Burden will play in Week 1. Fantasy managers should not draft him at his previous WR21 cost until he returns to practice. A WR25-WR30 draft range properly reflects uncertainty. It also preserves room for the explosive second-year breakout that made Burden a popular Bears training camp target in the first place.
If you love sports, download Stadium Rant from the Apple App Store and join one of the fastest-growing social sports communities. Be sure to follow us on socials too — you can find all our profiles on our Linktree.
