Chelsea have now lost back-to-back pre-season friendlies — 2-1 to Tottenham in Sydney, then 1-0 to Juventus in Hong Kong.
On the surface, that’s a rough month for a club that spent big again this summer. But two Chelsea pre-season defeats tell you very little about a team’s actual level unless you look at how they happened.
Here’s what Chelsea’s losses to Spurs and Juventus really reveal before the Premier League begins.
Quick summary: Chelsea’s two pre-season defeats exposed two recurring issues — late-game management and a lack of cutting edge in the final third.
However, an incomplete squad still missing several first-team players means neither result should yet be treated as a serious warning sign.
Chelsea vs Tottenham
Chelsea vs Juventus
Look past the scorelines and a clear pattern emerges:
Chelsea have now been undone by a single moment of quality in both matches, in games that were tight for long stretches.
Against Tottenham, Chelsea dominated for nearly 40 minutes with a numerical advantage after a red card, only to concede a stoppage-time winner.
Against Juventus, the game was goalless and tightly contested until Edon Zhegrova curled home the only real moment of quality either side produced.
The two teams combined for just six shots on target across the entire 90 minutes. Two different opponents, two different goals conceded, but the same underlying issue:
Chelsea are competitive without being clinical, and it’s costing them results in the moments that matter most.
Alonso’s public tone across both defeats has been consistent, and deliberately so.
After the Wanderers game he talked about being in “these momentums” of a new project;
ahead of Juventus he described the tour as still “in the middle of pre-season,” with every game a chance to “analyse it, the things that we have worked, we have done right, what we can improve.”
That is not the language of a manager alarmed by results — it’s someone treating Chelsea vs Tottenham and Chelsea vs Juventus as diagnostic tools rather than tests to pass or fail.
Whether that patience is well-placed is a fair question.
It does mean judging this Xabi Alonso Chelsea project purely on the scoreline misreads what he himself says he’s trying to get out of it.
Both defeats came with a genuinely important caveat; Chelsea have played neither game with anything close to a full-strength squad.
Enzo Fernandez, Valentín Barco, Henderson, Morgan Rogers and Maxence Lacroix were all still on holiday after extended World Cup runs.
Mykhailo Mudryk only returned to full training days before the Juventus game and played the final eight minutes of his comeback.
New signings Danny Welbeck and Geovany Quenda were only just integrating into the squad, with Cole Palmer left out of the XI entirely against Juventus.
That’s not an excuse for the pattern of late lapses in game management — those are more about concentration than personnel.
However, it’s a real reason to be cautious about reading too much into results produced by a squad that will look meaningfully different by matchday one.
It’s not all warning signs. Geovany Quenda’s full debut against Juventus was one of the brighter individual performances of the tour.
He was lively down the right, combining well with Marco Palestra, and directly involved in Chelsea’s clearest chances.
The pressing that forced Tottenham’s red card showed real intensity even in a low-stakes fixture, and Chelsea’s territorial control against a well-organized Juventus side, even without scoring, suggests the underlying approach isn’t the problem.
The issue in Hong Kong specifically was end product — Chelsea’s best chances came from a Welbeck header wide and a Palestra effort well saved, not a shortage of possession or chances created in general play.
Strip away the noise and there are two real, specific issues worth tracking rather than the scorelines themselves:
Game management in the closing stages of matches, and generating more cutting edge in the final third once Chelsea do build pressure.
The two issues are fixable with more minutes together as a settled group, and both are exactly the kind of pattern pre-season exists to surface while the stakes are still low.
If either issue is still showing up once Chelsea’s full squad is available and the Premier League begins, that’s the moment to actually worry.
Two defeats in a row looks bad on a form table.
The real verdict on Chelsea’s progress will come once Alonso has his strongest squad available and Premier League points, rather than pre-season results, are on the line.
Chelsea have been competitive and shown real individual promise from their new faces — while repeatedly falling short in the moments that decide results, against a squad that’s still missing several key pieces.
Whether that’s a passing phase or a real flaw won’t be clear until the games start to count.
If you love sports, download Stadium Rant from the Apple App Store and join one of the fastest-growing social sports communities. Be sure to follow us on socials too — you can find all our profiles on our Linktree.
